精彩推荐:青光眼 白内障 近视 远视 散光 斜视弱视 角膜溃疡 角膜炎 沙眼 眼外伤 更多疾病
大众频道
专业频道
时尚频道
互动频道
疾 病 | 保 健 | 爱眼动态 | 名医名院
知 识 | 美 食 | 自检自测 | 爱眼纪事
资 讯 | 临 床 | 学 术 | 文 献
图 谱 | 医 患 | 继 教 | 家 园
五官之美 | 整 形 | 美 容
眼镜一族 | 妆 容 | 图 库
眼科在线 | 预留位置
眼科知道 | 在线咨询
  当前位置:当前位置: 中华眼科在线 → 医学频道 → 临床医学 → 论文汇集 → 正文 切换到繁體中文 用户登录 新用户注册
romotion of proliferation and migration of Müller cells by RPE cells in a coculture system

http://www.cnophol.com 2009-8-3 13:18:21 中华眼科在线

  INTRODUCTION

  Müller cells and retinal pigment epithelium cells (RPE) play very important roles in the maintenance of visual function, and they are involved in many pathological processes. For example, experiments conducted to examine the effects of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) showed that the proliferation of Müller cells and RPE resulted in the formation of proliferative membrane. In the present study, Müller cells were cocultured with RPE both under normoxic and hypoxic conditions to observe the effect of RPE on the proliferation and migration of Müller cells.

  MATERIALS AND METHODS

  Cell Culture  Newborn pigmented rabbits (810 days old, provided by Experimental Center of Harbin Medical University) were used for primary culture. Five rabbits were anesthetized and sacrificed, after which the eyeballs were aseptically removed.

  Müller cells culture  The eyeballs were dissected along the ora serrata. Lens and vitreous body were removed. Then the pigment epithelium was removed from the neurosensory retina, and the latter was cut into small pieces. The retinal tissue was cultured in a dish with 5mL Dulbeccos Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), supplemented with 200mL/L fetal bovine serum (FBS), at 37℃with 50mL/L CO2. About 7 days later, the tissue block adhered to the wall, and cells began to migrate out of the margin of the block. The obtained cells were cultured as previously described [1]; subsequently they were immunocytochemically identified by two specific markers, GFAP antibody and S100 antibody. The secondto fourthpassage RPE cells were used in these studies.

  RPE culture  The anterior segment and lens were separated. Afterwards, the neural retina and any remaining vitreous body were removed. The remaining optic cup was washed with phosphatebuffered saline (PBS), and a solution of trypsin (2.5g/L) was applied to the cup for 30 minutes at 37℃. The cells were then gently scraped off the posterior layer of the optic cup into the trypsin solution, and an equal volume of DMEM supplemented with 100mL/L FBS was added to neutralize enzyme activity. The final cell suspension was transferred to a 10mL centrifuge tube and spun at 1000 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were resuspended in DMEM, supplemented with 100mL/L FBS, then transferred into culture dishes at 37℃ with 50mL/L CO2 [2]. The homogeneity of cultured RPE cells was confirmed by mAb to cytokeratins. The second generation cells were used for experiment.

  Assay for Proliferation of Müller Cells  Two assays were performed to observe the proliferation of Müller cells. One detected the change of Müller cells at various time points; another detected the change of Müller cells under various conditions. Hypoxia was achieved using CoCl2 at a concentration of 200μmol/L.
Assay for various time points  Transwell system (0.4μm) was used to develop a coculture system[3].  In the coculture group, the RPE (200μL, 5×104/mL) were cultured in the upper wells (insert), while the Müller cells (500μL, 5×104/mL) were cultured in the lower wells. As controls, there were no cells cultured in the lower wells[4].  In both the coculture group and control group, Müller cells were measured by MTT at various time points (3, 6, 24 and 48 hours). Table 1  A values of the control group and the coculture group at various time points(略)

  Absorption was measured by a scanning multiwell
spectrophotometer at 570nm, recorded as A value. There were 5 separate experiments, each performed in duplicate at each time point; therefore, 20 wells were used for each group.

  Assay for various conditions  Transwell system (0.4μm) was used to develop a coculture system. In the coculture group, the RPE cells (200μL, 5×104/mL) were cultured in the upper wells (insert), while the Müller cells (500μL, 5×104/mL) were cultured in the lower wells. There were no cells cultured in the upper wells in the Müller only group. The proliferation of Müller cells was measured by MTT under various conditions at 24 hours. There were 5 separate experiments carried out in duplicate under different conditions.

  Assay for Migration of Müller Cells  Two assays were performed to observe the migration of Müller cells. One was conducted to detect the change of Müller cells at various time points, and the other was conducted to observe any change of Müller cells under various conditions. Hypoxia was achieved by use of CoCl2, with a concentration of 200μmol/L.

  Assay for various time points  Transwell system (8μm) was used to develop a coculture system. In the coculture group, the Müller cells (200μL, 5×104/mL) were cultured in the upper wells (insert), while the RPE cells (500μL, 5×104/mL) were cultured in the lower wells. As controls, there were no cells cultured in the lower wells. The average number of cells under three observed fields was calculated under a phasecontrast microscope ×400. There were 5 separate experiments carried out in duplicate at each time point; therefore, there were 20 wells for each group.

  Assay for various conditions  Transwell system (8μm) was used to develop a coculture system. In the coculture group, the Müller cells (200μL, 5×104/mL) were cultured in the upper wells (insert), while the RPE cells (500μL, 5×104/mL) were cultured in the lower wells. There were no cells cultured in the lower wells in the Müller only group. The number of cells which migrated through micropores and stayed on the outer bottom side of the insert system were calculated at 24 hours under a phasecontrast microscope ×400. In addition, the average number of cells under three observed fields was calculated under a phasecontrast microscope ×400. A total of 5 separate experiments were carried out in duplicate under different conditions.

  Data Processing and Analysis  Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS13.0 statistical software. Repeated ANOVA was applied to data collected at various time points. Table 2  A values of Müller cell proliferation in factorial design study(略)

  Time was treated as the withinsubject factor and the group as the betweensubject factor. Factorial experiments were employed to analyze the data of various conditions. The level of significance was set at P=0.05.

  RESULTS

  Cell Culture  On Day 7 of primary culture, the tissue blocks were observed to be sticking to the wall. Several pseudopodiums had developed and gradually crept out of the tissue block to form a single cell. On Day 14, more than 80% fusion cells were found. More than 95% subcultured cells showed positive staining results using GFAP or S100 immunohistochemistry. Under transmission electron microscope (TEM), cells presented enriched cytoplasm, large nuclei and 810nm characteristic midsilks. RPE cells displayed intense pigmentation and presented cobblestone morphology.  More than 95% of the cells showed positive staining by cytokeratin immunocytochemistry. On the basis of morphologic appearance and the expression of yellowbrown through cytokeratin immunocytochemistry, the RPE cells were confirmed.

  Proliferation of Müller Cells  Proliferation of Müller cells in the control group and the coculture group was detected by MTT at various time points. The MTT results are shown by A values in Table 1. Neither the difference between 3 and 6 hours nor between 24 and 48 hours was statistically significant. Nevertheless, there was statistically significant difference among other time points. Statistically significant difference between the control group and the coculture group was found.

  A 2×2 factorial design study (condition [CO]: normoxia, hypoxia; culture [CU]: Müller cells and RPE, Müller cells only) showed that the main effects both of CO and CU were significant for proliferation of Müller cells, whereas the interaction term (CO×CU) was not significant. The MTT results under different culture conditions are shown by A values in Table 2 and Figure 1.

  Migration of Müller Cells  The number of Müller cells migrating through micropores and staying on the outer bottom side of insert systems at different time points are given in. Statistically significant difference was found among four different time points, except between 3 and 6 hours time points. There was statistically significant difference between the control group and the coculture group.Table 3  Number of Müller cells migrating in the control group and the coculture group atvarious time points(略)Table 4  Migration of Müller cells in a factorial design(略)

  A 2×2 factorial design study (culture [CU]: Müller cells and RPE, Müller cells alone; condition [CO]: normoxia, hypoxia) showed that the main effects both of CU and CO were significant for migration of Müller cells, whereas the interaction term (CU×CO) was not significant. Table 4 and Figure 2 showed the migration of Müller cells in the factorial design.

[1] [2] 下一页

(来源:互联网)(责编:xhhdm)

发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口
  • 下一条信息: 没有了
  • 更多关于(眼睛,中华眼科在线,眼科,Transwell小室,缺氧,视网膜色素上皮细胞,Müller细胞)的信息
      热门图文

    一分钟和熊猫眼说拜拜

    林志玲教你拯救"绝望黑

    养出“媚眼”的七种对

    彩虹萤光眼妆缔造闪亮
      健康新看点
      健康多视点
    ad推广
      图话健康
    点击申请点击申请点击申请点击申请
    中国视力网中国眼网眼镜人久久眼科网华夏健康网健康863保健阿里医药眼科网首席医学网浙江眼科网
    点击申请点击申请点击申请点击申请点击申请点击申请点击申请点击申请点击申请点击申请

    Copyright © 2007 中华眼科在线 网站备案序列号: 京ICP备08009675号
    本网站由五景药业主办 北京金鼎盛世医学传媒机构负责运营 国家医学教育发展中心提供学术支持
    服务电话:010-63330565 服务邮箱: [email protected]